200 years ago, in the United States, women couldn't vote, couldn't own property, and were not considered fit for higher education, or for most professional jobs, among other things.

Now you're talking about not paying enough attention to heart attacks and whether AIs should decide to fill in "girlfriend" when context suggests lower pay.

If you suggest that we need to do better at detecting heart attacks in women (the symptoms are often less clear in addition to care providers being less likely to assume a heart attack, which is a bad combination), I absolutely agree.

Presumably so would everyone in your training group, since accurate diagnosis (to the extent practical) is part of medical care, and medical care is something we can extend as a right to people, thanks to our high standard of living.

Someone needs to find and point out the places that need attention, and gather sufficient consensus to fix that as opposed to other things that might be done instead, and it's not necessarily easy, but the support is pretty good in principle.

However, if you think this is anywhere near as important as, say, having voting rights, I very much disagree. The biggest battle was: should women be treated as equal?

And those who said no lost, and those who said yes won.

(The United States seems to be going backwards with regards to reproductive rights, so there I might grant that there's an example of a really major, fundamental right that is still in question.)