Assuredly not. History should be taught accurately, selecting topics that lean towards inspiration/hope over cynicism/depression for young people, but squarely addressing injustices, because through hope they may affect change where their elders have failed. (Also: because in the very long run, hope has thus far been accurate.)

But if there are arguments about the content, let's address them, not get stuck up on terminology.

(P.S. I note that you're no longer claiming that nothing resembling CRT is being taught or being proposed to be taught in school...that at least is progress.)