But this isn't in any important sense patriarchal. It got away from the patriarchy a long time ago. Patriarchy, under almost any recognizable definition, is a market inefficiency to be gradually crushed away.
Thus, the "patri" part is a distractor. The movement of capital doesn't depend on gender.
Capitalism is nothing more than the natural exchange of things to mutually increase perceived marginal value, without concern for consequences, and with no particular attention to timescale. Do you particularly value the delighted smile on your child's face as they're trick-or-treating? Our new $1900 smartphone has the best low-light camera around! Homeless people on the sidewalk spoiling the scenery? Our new $1900 smartphone's AI can erase them from your photos with a tap of a finger! Starving people rioting in the streets? Our new $1900 smartphone can summon private security forces to your door instantly with a short phrase!
That capitalism was embraced and promoted by genuinely patriarchal systems is not particularly more germaine to what capitalism is now that is the fact that science was developed by Christians. Science escaped its birthplace, as has capitalism.
If you care that women perform 75% of unpaid labor, you are embracing capitalism. Capitalism is the view that everything should be dissected as labor and value; Jedi mind tricks don't work, only money.
Unfortunately, it turns out that the short-sighted pursuit of individual and organized-group maximization of marginal value ends up with some deeply anti-social consequences, both because of prisoner's-dilemma/tragedy-of-the-commons situations, and because people (men and women alike) tend to dislike being ubiquitously in that regime.
But if you think that anything to do with gender per se, or anything to do with dominance hierarchies, is the key factor behind the problems of late-stage capitalism, you need to reconsider. The power granted by capitalism is grass-roots in nature. Originally-patriarchal dominance hierarchies have been fighting the power of capitalism for quite some time, with some victories (e.g. antitrust law) and some losses (now).
If it turns out that capitalism happens to grassrootsedly reward divergent personality traits that happen to express more often in men than women, that's no more "patriarchal" than is the floral industry "matriarchal" because women are larger consumers of flowers than men.
China provides a stellar example of the (patriarchy-flavored)-authoritarianism-capitalism fight being resolved more in favor of patriarchy: compare, for instance, Jack Ma to Xi Jinping.