Do you deny that people have emotions, and that they act according to those emotions?

Do you deny that as an objective fact, the large majority of people have an emotional affinity for things like health and happiness, and an emotional aversion to things like starvation and injury?

Do you deny that I am writing for the large majority rather than the atypical outliers? Do you construe my imperative statements ("we should" and the like) as anything but giving advice regarding how present actions may lead to future consequences with emotional salience as assessed by the typical reader?

Your points are very strange--almost as if they were emotional rather than logical.