If you teach them the ideas and the methods but don't use the name, you're still doing it.
In Critical Race Theory, an Introduction, 3rd ed (Delgado and Stefancic, 2017), they say, "Racism is ordinary, not aberrational...because racism advances the interest of both white elites (materially) and working-class whites (psychically), large segments of society have little incentive to eradicate it." (pp 8-9). So, how do you investigate things like this? Maybe you should
Identify the motivations, tools, and implications of power, authority, and governance as it relates to systems of oppression and its impact on ethnic and religious groups and other historically marginalized groups.
Delgado and Stefancic continue: "The new accounts dare to call our most prized legal doctrines and protections shams [because]...People of different races have radically different experiences as they go through life." (p. 48). How do you investigate this? Maybe you should try to
Explain why individuals and groups, including ethnic and religious groups, and traditionally marginalized groups during the same historical period differed in their perspectives of events, cycles, or movements in the United States.
Delgado and Stefancic again: "Critical race theorists have turned critique inward, examining the interplay of power and authority within minority communities [by investigating intersectionality]...'Intersectionality' means the examination of race, sex, class, national origin, and sexual orientation and how their combinations play out in various settings." So maybe you
Evaluate the influence of the intersections of identity, including but not limited to, gender, age, race, ethnicity, religion, physical and mental disability, and class on the living histories and experiences of peoples, groups, and events.
Except, you know what? All those italicized sections are curriculum goals for public school ethnic studies. (Care to guess which grade for each?)
So. CRT isn't being taught? Or there isn't at least an attempt to teach it? Unless you're being obfuscatingly pedantic, I don't see how that claim stands up.
(Even if many of your others do.)