I'm aware, but as with many social "sciences" I am not yet convinced that it is a science even in its best incarnation. Social and moral psychology is a science when done well, so there's hope.

Maybe the folks who are particularly focused on causal inference can legitimately give their research the mantle of science, but I haven't delved into their research in enough detail to determine this. (It's entirely possible to use fancy mathematical methods in a context where one is still at best weakly constrained by evidence, and one's theories end up not undergoing any particularly stringent testing. There's also the huge problem of "fancy math tells us that X" in the case where the reality of X does not meet the premises that the fancy math require. So while things like this almost always require a sophisticated mathematical approach, merely noting the presence of one is quite inadequate to establish something as a science.)