I’m not sure what “threat” you mean, but loosely-CRT-inspired curricula do end up being taught to actual children. Why do you think not? (Of course not everything which is thought about or talked about is taught.) Shall we go look for evidence?

Also, the question is not about truth (you should always teach that), but framing and emphasis.

Finally, “GMAFB” is not a persuasive response to an article discussing research. Maybe you don’t feel like addressing the issue in a serious way, but there are ways to convey that without painting yourself in quite such an anti-intellectual light. (Like, for instance, not commenting.)