"In summary, the text seems aware of the issues with tone policing but simultaneously argues for the practical consideration of tone in persuasive communication."

Funny, ChatGPT seems to think I've already got it and am presenting a "nuanced view". (Its words.)

You know, the reason I didn't initially respond to you directly is because exactly this sort of snark-over-content attitude. I don't mind the snark personally. But when you don't have any content aside from snark when faced with criticism, what's the point?