Isn't that practically a definitional statement of speaking from privilege?

Also, I don't see much evidence that you understood the content of my argument. I said the ideological war was won, and you responded with the state of affairs. But I already explained what kind of problems remain after winning the ideological war.

I want the problems solved, and I gave some examples of why they're not simple, and I argued that most everyone nominally wants the problems solved (which you did not dispute). The question is whether "feminism" can provide solutions, or if too many adherents just want to shout about the problems, possibly making things worse along the way (e.g. by exuding a powerful anti-man message save possibly for those men who most fervently adhere to the feminist label). If feminism isn't the best source of solutions to the problems, why would one style oneself as such in the context of affluent Western society?