I've got one! Systems Sociology.

Just like systems biology broadened the narrow look-at-this-one-pathway view of molecular biology to understanding the whole system, without any loss of scientific rigor (though sometimes loss of detailed modeling is necessary), so too could "systems sociology" take the kind of all-encompassing view that critical theories aspire to, but built on top of sound fundamentals: quantification, reproducibility, modeling, impartiality.

Not only does this capture basically everything of value that has ever come out of critical theory, while making it usable instead of inspirational, it also helps cover one of the most glaring holes in "woke" takes of critical theory which is appropriately detailed analysis of the effect of changes on the system as a whole. Like if you really want to try to end up in a society with fewer racial problems, is it really the wisest strategy to come up with a whole bunch of disparaging-sounding terms for the largest racial group ("white fragility" etc)?

The main downside is that it's incredibly difficult to make rigorous enough to do well--but what choice do we have? Anything else is just guessing and hoping.

Critical theorists never seemed to move beyond the Nietzsche strategy in this regard: try to speak movingly enough so that everyone will be swayed to your perspective, and your fantasies will become reality.

Firstly, it doesn't work like that, not even for Nietzsche. Secondly, they were no Nietzsche.