No, I got that, and addressed it specifically.

Thanks for reading, however I see that unfortunately the point of my article has been missed. The object is to tell BOTH SIDES, as should be done with ALL historical figures. If you can admit that they can be great and flawed, why then the issue with discussing it?
Thanks for reading, however I see that unfortunately the point of my article has been missed.
1
Jeanette C. Espinoza
Rex Kerr
·Follow
Mar 28, 2024
--
No, I got that, and addressed it specifically. You seem to have missed my point which is that a blunt bothsidesism can be misleading--possibly even more misleading than the unjustified hero-worship, if the historical context isn't appreciated.
--
--
Written by Rex Kerr604 Followers
·33 Following
One who rejoices when everything is made as simple as possible, but no simpler. Sayer of things that may be wrong, but not so bad that they're not even wrong.
Responses (1)
Help
Status
About
Careers
Press
Blog
Privacy
Terms
Text to speech
Teams