Not good enough when the accepted narrative is "stolen election". This is a really serious charge.

It's fine to ask questions. It's tolerable, if a bit foolish, to spend taxpayer's money to ask non-experts to review yet again things that already checked out when experts looked at them. (If the voters decide it was too foolish, they can vote out whoever okayed it next election.) But it's not fine to pretend that the answers are the ones that require you to overthrow democracy, or to vote out or replace the people who said things were fine and demonstrated that they were fine, in favor of people who will do the "right thing".

The problem is, propaganda works if you allow it to spread unchecked. Something like two-thirds of Republicans say they believe the election was actually stolen. Not just "there were some minor irregularities" but "the results actually came out backwards": https://www.npr.org/2021/11/01/1050291610/most-americans-trust-elections-are-fair-but-sharp-divides-exist-a-new-poll-finds

"Some basis for belief" doesn't cut it. Very solid evidence of existence and magnitude does.

The illiberality is also on full display with the push to change laws so that legislatures can more easily override voting results (I guess ostensibly due to voting irregularities but in practice not strictly constrained to clear and strictly proven massive result-changing fraud).

This is right out of the authoritarian dictator playbook. It's as illiberal as you can get.