Oh, lovely! The main thing the original article was missing was a detailed example of climate doomerism, but you've now fixed this oversight!

Astute readers will notice (1) the conspicuous lack of citations to, say, the IPCC AR6 WG2 report on the best scientific evidence for the impacts of climate change; (2) an utter failure to acknowledge that the original article contains multiple statements of the serious problems associated with cliamte change, instead foisting charges of denialism; (3) repeated personal attacks complete with mind-reading; (4) in places, flat out charging that the article said exactly the opposite of what it did; and (5) a dose of conspiracy theory to top it all off.

Archetypical climate doomerism. Thanks so much for the example!