Oh, okay--so you weren't actually responding to anything that he said specifically. You instead take issue with the entire strategy of debate against anything that claims to deconstruct the manipulations that support the Racial Hierarchy?

But I don't understand how this works at all. The most central aspect of science is that ideas are constantly tested by evidence and open to challenge. So it certainly isn't anything like science if you can't constantly debate it. (It's not good history either--history is a heavily evidence-based discipline. Of course you don't bother debating issues that are already very well settled (e.g. the Holocaust happened), but you do continue to debate the parts which are less certain (e.g. what were the dominant factors that allowed the German people to go along with it).)

So I'm not sure what you're getting at with your charge of pseudoscience. It seems like you're advocating something that is a worse way to come to reliable knowledge than even pretending to be science.