Okay, on reflection, you do sort of have some kind of point here, but it's very poorly developed, as you can see by the by-far-most-upvoted comment being, basically, "this makes no sense".

You need to think more carefully about the point you want to make, and choose what you present in order to be focused on that point. (See, for instance, https://www.grammarly.com/blog/how-to-write-a-persuasive-essay/.)

You can also ask ChatGPT specific questions about whether you're accomplishing some goal, and revise your text accordingly. (It does not work well to ask ChatGPT to write your text. Using it as a critic, however, can be valuable, even if it messes up sometimes, and keeps giving the same general advice over and over, like "These are complex issues".)

As it is, you've only managed to demonstrate a very poor attempt to make a point, and also apparently managed to trigger a few people (not hard!).

If, for instance, you wanted to make this a referendum on your actions, you'd need to ditch the Bill Burr quote (not relevant), and double down on the core points of (1) woman could have been in trouble; (2) you intervened; (3) you don't identify as a feminist; (4) doesn't this illustrate that (whatever-your-point-actually-is).

For instance, you could argue that although the woman was the physical aggressor, she was actually the one in far greater physical danger, and wasn't it correct of you to intervene--and isn't this contrary to something? (E.g. either you could claim that feminism says you shouldn't intervene, or that it claims you should have intervened to protect the man instead, or that feminists deny that anyone acts like you did but clearly they're wrong on that count, or something.)

If you actually had a well-formed point (not feminists failing in their duty to magically divine danger and teleport a few blocks to save their sister, the physical aggressor), then you might get some sort of sensible answer. E.g., feminist: "Men don't intervene!" You: "I did!" Feminist: "So maybe you did but in general they don't!" You: "They would if they believed what I believe, not what you do!" Feminist: "Your position is the historical one and historically they don't intervene!" You: "That's because of bad execution, not because it's a bad idea--you don't stop trying to teach reading just cause a lot of kids don't read at their grade level!" Feminist: "The idea that you perpetually need to execute on this is part of what's causing the problem because it accepts violence from men as the norm!" etc. etc.

If you just want to rile people up, you don't need to write nearly so much. I assume you're trying to make a point. But you really need to focus much better if you're going to get beyond a few people being triggered and a few others going, "Uh, like, what even is this? No, that doesn't follow???"