Okay, since you asked.

Hostile:

"Your story is pointless"

"The "other side" are those who view women as brood mares and baby ovens." (Note that Dancova is "on the other side" given that you're arguing against him.)

"People who want to decide for others what they do with their bodies deserve to be called all the things that they are."

Extreme:

"It's completely and totally irrelevant when life begins." (There is a corresponding non-extreme point but this is phrased in an extreme way.)

"The "other side" are those who view women as brood mares and baby ovens." (It's extreme because the assumption is that there are two sides; Dancova was saying that there are intermediate positions.)

"So WTF should it be legal to force anyone to preserve the life of someone else at the expense of their body autonomy?" (Note--if the baby is viable, it is still preserving their life to carry them until a C-section or labor, and that is still at the expense of bodily autonomy. That a doctor won't agree to the swiftest lowest-impact way to preserve your bodily autonomy does not mean that you have bodily autonomy--it just means that your doctor is the one curtailing it.)

"The reasonable argument is to get the fuck away from me and to stop thinking that you have any right to determine what I do with my body autonomy. There is no other "reasonable" response."