Okay, so your standard is, "If there is any way shape or form in which an action can possibly be construed as not as good at advancing women as it possibly could be, and men did anything but their utmost to oppose this action in favor of the one that was completely pristine and perfect, then men as a group aren't advancing the interests of women"?

Or what?

You just declared that 58% of men wasn't good enough for various reasons.

Clearly define the goalposts. Then we can see if balls have been going through them or not.

Note: when defining the goalposts, to demonstrate that they're not an unobtainable fantasy, please list at least one example of women very clearly meeting your definition.