The problem is that if you only talk in general terms like this, you miss the places where there is actually something to talk about. (Which is exactly what you did when you made a broad declarative statement in response to my more detailed reply.)

For instance, is there any violation of a woman's rights if cis men are permitted to exist in a woman's space? Is gender-specific space even a right? If so, why? What about sex-specific space? Is the answer different? Why?

If you go beyond general statements of belief and start working through the rationale behind them, you can pretty easily find cases where there is an apparent conflict (maybe not in "rights" but at least in what would be ideal, and maybe not in principle but perhaps as put into practice in one particular way), and those are worth discussing.