This is also true of most third-trimester babies, with the only complication being that they're still inside the woman's body. So it's not a false equivalency for third-trimester abortion (especially later in the third trimester).

And Ololade's apparently going after that part when he says, "The only difference between kids within those age brackets and an unborn baby is where they are"

You're arguing only the very easiest point, which Ololade isn't even obviously making.

If one means, "Once a baby has a reasonable chance to survive outside the mother, then it should be delivered rather than aborted," then to answer a question like the one Ololade raised, one can just say that.

If one means something else, then one must say something else--but one should at least address the main thrust of the question, not evade it.