Well, I rather doubt that you mean this in a genuine sense. If you do, it's because you've realized that the criteria for "as a group" that you hold are so strict that no group can meet it--including, but not limited to, "men as a group".

So I guess we're done: you either got the point, or have retreated into genuine snark, and either way there's nowhere else productive to go.

I'm not interested in playing the dominance hierarchy game where in order to joust for standing we trot out various largely unverifiable claims of individual pro-woman actions.