Whether or not you have correctly inferred who I am, thank you for the invitation to consider your neurophilosophy writings. I am not certain I will have time to get to them--there is no point if I am not going to take the time to do them justice--but I at least will consider it!

However, as you will see / may have already seen from my other comments, I think we have pretty divergent perspectives regarding human morality and human society. They might be reconcilable--one would certainly hope so, given that we both seem to be committed to rational argumentation, at least in large part. But the positions themselves seem quite remarkably far apart.

If I read it without turning on my analytic side, it sounds pretty good. Once I start asking any hard questions like "how do you know", "what is the basis for that", "how is that distributed", "what is the effect size", "does this apportion responsibility in proportion to direct causality or in some other way", etc., I have a very hard time swallowing many of your claims.