Rex Kerr
Oct 16, 2022

--

Why not? It would be effective. (Need to do something in India as well, of course.)

Additionally, cows are a relatively inefficient converter of plant calories into meat, so other environmental problems can be ameliorated by encouraging a reduction of cow meat consumption to what is naturally supported by the environment (e.g. pastured cows; cows grazing on marginal lands that can't really be utilized for anything else; etc.).

So when the climate effect is positive, and the ancillary effects are positive, what is the rationale to not do it?

(I agree that penalizing farmers is a bad idea--it just shifts the production to places with even poorer controls, which can be compensated for via tariffs and other means, but it's overall sloppy and wasteful.)

--

--

Rex Kerr
Rex Kerr

Written by Rex Kerr

One who rejoices when everything is made as simple as possible, but no simpler. Sayer of things that may be wrong, but not so bad that they're not even wrong.

Responses (1)