You can't distinguish, from this, whether you're caught in an echo chamber of like-minded people, or whether the view is more broadly acceptable.

My threshold for hostility starts at a different level than yours, and for good reason, I think, but I don't feel like arguing the point any more than I already have.

You keep saying things about Dancova that doesn't match the content of this message (e.g. you say he wants to "shut women up" but in the article you replied to, he explicitly rejected that this was a goal: "It is a case of men and women holding opinions on both sides. If there were some magic way to remove men from this discussion. The debate and the differences of opinion would largely be the same."). I don't have the energy to perform a thorough examination of Dancova's character as revealed through a detailed examination of his posts, and you don't seem to want to talk about what he actually said this time, only what you think it means because of other interactions, so I think it would be more productive to just stop this line of discussion.