You left the actual arguments as an exercise for the reader.

"Let me assure you, physics works perfectly fine within black holes." You call that an argument?! Your assurance?

"Whole cosmos operates in "Ouroborian mode." Living and nonliving alike." is an argument against life being consumptive?! You granted the point--then said, "Your hate of life is a sight to behold nevertheless." Huh?

C'mon. The problem isn't that I can't comprehend your arguments. The problem is that whether or not you thought them, you didn't bother typing them.

Of course I can come up with my own arguments which may or may not coincide with yours. But you really didn't present any decent level of argumentation here.