You said "invisible destructions", not invisible resistance. I don't know how to have a non-violent destruction, do you?

"invisible destructions, such as workplace sabotage, ..., increased vandalism of state property and infrastructure"

What is "workplace sabotage" if genuinely nonviolent? How do you invisibly vandalize state property and infrastructure except by actually damaging it functionally? The whole point of graffiti is to be visible.

So, yes, you mentioned violence.

And you're pushing for it, because you argue that there's no point attempting to use the political system, because "all its outcomes are delegitimized a priori".

If you don't mean this, say something else.