You're evading. You claimed to have specific knowledge of a specific aspect of the problem. It is not sealioning to ask you to support your point which is a central area of contention.

That's called discussion or debate.

You asked me for a specific thing: temperature records not corrupted by heat island effects. I gave you exactly what you asked for, by giving you a reference that does what you ask.

And I ask you for the same in return: show me why it isn't what it seems to be.